Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales
Impact in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Argentine historical studies
Papers in
- Cultural Studies 132
- Argentine historical studies 108
- Top scholars
- Melina PortoSandra Edith MiguelMartín RetamozoMichalinos ZembylasMichael ByramZaida Chinchilla‐RodríguezMaría Cláudia Cabrini GrácioFélix de Moya Anegón
In The Last Decade
Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales
475 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 141
- Cultural Studies 183
- Language and Linguistics 240
- Linguistics and Language 80
- Communication 82
Countries citing scholars working at Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales at the time of their publication.
About Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales have published 693 papers, which have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 132 papers in Cultural Studies, 49 papers in Gender Studies, 28 papers in Urban Studies, 20 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and 173 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Argentine historical studies (108 papers), Latin American socio-political dynamics (29 papers), Memory, violence, and history (29 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (27 papers), Historical Education Studies Worldwide (25 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (25 papers), Latin American Literature Analysis (25 papers) and Historical Studies in Latin America (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (141 citations), Cultural Studies (183 citations), Language and Linguistics (240 citations), Linguistics and Language (80 citations) and Communication (82 citations). Authors at Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales collaborate with scholars in Argentina, Spain and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Revista Tempo e Argumento, Language Culture and Curriculum, Scientometrics, Language and Intercultural Communication and Revista Paginas. Some of Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales's most productive authors include Melina Porto, Sandra Edith Miguel, Martín Retamozo, Michalinos Zembylas, Michael Byram, Zaida Chinchilla‐Rodríguez, María Cláudia Cabrini Grácio, Félix de Moya Anegón, Rita Salvatore and Cassidy R. Sugimoto.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.