National University of Tres de Febrero

4.0k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National University of Tres de Febrero

736 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

National University of Tres de Febrero
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Conservation 145
  • Cultural Studies 239
  • Business and International Management 42
  • Earth-Surface Processes 136
  • Archeology 212
Replace Gobierno de Chile with:
Gobierno de Chile Chile
Universidad de Playa Ancha de Ciencias de la Educación Chile
Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
University Ucinf Chile
Universidad La República Chile
Instituto de Estudos Avançados da Universidade de São Paulo Brazil
Institute of Religious Studies Brazil
Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez Chile
Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia Brazil
Secretaria Municipal de Educação de São Paulo Brazil
National University of Tres de Febrero relative to Gobierno de Chile Chile Gobierno de Chile's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.2×
Gobierno de Chile · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National University of Tres de Febrero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National University of Tres de Febrero. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National University of Tres de Febrero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National University of Tres de Febrero more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National University of Tres de Febrero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National University of Tres de Febrero at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National University of Tres de Febrero at the time of their publication.

About National University of Tres de Febrero

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National University of Tres de Febrero have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 143 papers in Cultural Studies, 33 papers in Museology, 84 papers in Demography, 36 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts and 6 papers in Life-span and Life-course Studies on the topics of Argentine historical studies (87 papers), Memory, violence, and history (50 papers), Education and Teacher Training (49 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (38 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (36 papers), Latin American socio-political dynamics (34 papers), Higher Education and Sustainability (33 papers) and E-Learning and Knowledge Management (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Conservation (145 citations), Cultural Studies (239 citations), Business and International Management (42 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (136 citations) and Archeology (212 citations). Authors at National University of Tres de Febrero collaborate with scholars in Argentina, Spain and Mexico and have published in prestigious journals including Solar Physics, El Profesional de la Informacion, Alea Estudos Neolatinos, Hispanic American Historical Review and Rethinking History. Some of National University of Tres de Febrero's most productive authors include Daniel Mato, Marcelo Bergman, Patrick van Zwanenberg, Mariano Ben Plotkin, Valeria Arza, Jefferson Mainardes, Gustavo Fondevila, Adrian Ely, Andy Stirling and Gabriela Siracusano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact