Institute For Defense Analyses

1.1k papers receiving 26.1k citations

Peers

Institute For Defense Analyses
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 1.4k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 1.2k
  • Geometry and Topology 1.4k
  • Artificial Intelligence 4.6k
  • Management Information Systems 1.3k
Replace Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science with:
Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science United States
Hebrew College United States
National Security Agency United States
New York City College of Technology United States
Ohio Northern University United States
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center United States
United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research United States
Iona College United States
University of the District of Columbia United States
Simons Foundation United States
Institute For Defense Analyses relative to Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science United States Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute For Defense Analyses

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute For Defense Analyses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute For Defense Analyses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute For Defense Analyses more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute For Defense Analyses

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute For Defense Analyses at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute For Defense Analyses at the time of their publication.

About Institute For Defense Analyses

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute For Defense Analyses have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 27.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 39 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 42 papers in Algebra and Number Theory, 188 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 28 papers in Software and 50 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty on the topics of Geophysical Methods and Applications (40 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (36 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (32 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (28 papers), Military Defense Systems Analysis (28 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (27 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (27 papers) and Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (1.4k citations), Algebra and Number Theory (1.2k citations), Geometry and Topology (1.4k citations), Artificial Intelligence (4.6k citations) and Management Information Systems (1.3k citations). Authors at Institute For Defense Analyses collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including Operations Research, AIAA Journal, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A and Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer. Some of Institute For Defense Analyses's most productive authors include Hugh Everett, Eric A. Hanushek, Arthur S. House, Charles A. Weber, Thomas H. Crystal, J. Barkley Rosser, Lowell Schoenfeld, Edward A. Bender, J. D. Fletcher and Rebecca A. Grier.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact