Institute For Defense Analyses

1.1k papers receiving 29.1k citations

Peers

Institute For Defense Analyses
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 1.6k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 1.3k
  • Geometry and Topology 1.6k
  • Artificial Intelligence 5.4k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.9k
Replace Haverford College with:
Haverford College United States
Princeton Public Schools United States
Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science United States
Hebrew College United States
Bell (Canada) Canada
United States Department of Defense United States
Office of Naval Research United States
Centre de recherches mathématiques Canada
New York City College of Technology United States
Indiana University South Bend United States
Institute For Defense Analyses relative to Haverford College United States Haverford College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Haverford College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute For Defense Analyses

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute For Defense Analyses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute For Defense Analyses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute For Defense Analyses more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute For Defense Analyses

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute For Defense Analyses at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute For Defense Analyses at the time of their publication.

About Institute For Defense Analyses

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute For Defense Analyses have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 31.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 39 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 43 papers in Algebra and Number Theory, 194 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 52 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 31 papers in Software on the topics of Geophysical Methods and Applications (40 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (35 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (34 papers), Military Defense Systems Analysis (29 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (29 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (28 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (26 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (1.6k citations), Algebra and Number Theory (1.3k citations), Geometry and Topology (1.6k citations), Artificial Intelligence (5.4k citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (1.9k citations). Authors at Institute For Defense Analyses collaborate with scholars in United States, South Korea and Israel and have published in prestigious journals including Operations Research, AIAA Journal, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A and Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer. Some of Institute For Defense Analyses's most productive authors include Hugh Everett, J. Dexter Fletcher, Eric Alan Hanushek, Arthur S. House, Charles A. Weber, Edward A. Bender, J. Barkley Rosser, Lowell Schoenfeld, Rebecca A. Grier and Thomas H. Crystal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact