United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Impact in
- Catalysis top 10%
- Ionic liquids properties and applications
-
- Digital Transformation in Industry
Papers in
-
- Particle accelerators and beam dynamics 20
-
- Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research 48
- Top scholars
- Edward H. GlaessgenDavid S. StargelDonald R. UlrichH. WeinstockT. SteinerS. J. PeartonD. P. NortonPaul C. Trulove
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (20 papers)Geophysical Research Letters (12 papers)Applied Physics Letters (11 papers)Proceedings of the IEEE (9 papers)AIAA Journal (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNorway
In The Last Decade
United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research
714 papers receiving 20.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
- Catalysis 874
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1.2k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.1k
- Polymers and Plastics 1.5k
- Materials Chemistry 4.9k
Countries citing scholars working at United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research at the time of their publication.
About United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research have published 781 papers, which have received a total of 20.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 124 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 144 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 13 papers in Instrumentation, 26 papers in Catalysis and 39 papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (48 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (33 papers), Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks (26 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (25 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (23 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (23 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (21 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Catalysis (874 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (1.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.1k citations), Polymers and Plastics (1.5k citations) and Materials Chemistry (4.9k citations). Authors at United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Norway and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Geophysical Research Letters, Applied Physics Letters, Proceedings of the IEEE and AIAA Journal. Some of United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research's most productive authors include Edward H. Glaessgen, David S. Stargel, Donald R. Ulrich, H. Weinstock, T. Steiner, S. J. Pearton, D. P. Norton, Paul C. Trulove, Erik Blasch and Young-Woo Heo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.