National Security Agency

20.3k citations
684 papers ·

Impact in

  • Software top 2%
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
    • Software Engineering Research
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Papers in

National Security Agency

558 papers receiving 18.9k citations

Peers

National Security Agency
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Software 2.8k
  • Information Systems 5.3k
  • Signal Processing 2.0k
  • Artificial Intelligence 5.6k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 2.9k
Replace IEEE Computer Society with:
IEEE Computer Society United States
Cambridge Scientific (United States) United States
Unisys (United States) United States
IBM (Canada) Canada
Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science United States
SAS Institute (United States) United States
MathWorks (United States) United States
Atlanta Technical College United States
Research!America (United States) United States
InterDigital (United States) United States
National Security Agency relative to IEEE Computer Society United States IEEE Computer Society's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
IEEE Computer Society · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Security Agency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Security Agency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Security Agency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Security Agency more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Security Agency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Security Agency at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Security Agency at the time of their publication.

About National Security Agency

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Security Agency have published 684 papers, which have received a total of 20.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 19 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, 44 papers in Signal Processing, 127 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 82 papers in Information Systems on the topics of Coding theory and cryptography (41 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (34 papers), Information and Cyber Security (31 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (25 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (21 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (17 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (14 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Software (2.8k citations), Information Systems (5.3k citations), Signal Processing (2.0k citations), Artificial Intelligence (5.6k citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (2.9k citations). Authors at National Security Agency collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, Journal of Bacteriology, The Journal of Immunology and Experimental Biology and Medicine. Some of National Security Agency's most productive authors include Thomas J. McCabe, Jerome A. Solinas, Jeffrey P. Cohen, R. W. R. Darling, Keith Schwab, Michael Lee Roukes, Raymond J. Hock, Albert J. Dalton, Raymond Bangle and J. F. Dillon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact