University of the District of Columbia

37.2k citations
2.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of the District of Columbia

1.7k papers receiving 33.9k citations

Peers

University of the District of Columbia
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Computer Networks and Communications 3.9k
  • Signal Processing 1.4k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.6k
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 434
  • Clinical Psychology 2.1k
Replace Monmouth University with:
Monmouth University United States
Lafayette College United States
Pace University United States
Hebrew College United States
Fairleigh Dickinson University United States
Conway School of Landscape Design United States
Université du Québec en Outaouais Canada
SUNY New Paltz United States
Iona College United States
Loyola University Maryland United States
University of the District of Columbia relative to Monmouth University United States Monmouth University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Monmouth University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of the District of Columbia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of the District of Columbia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of the District of Columbia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of the District of Columbia more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of the District of Columbia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of the District of Columbia at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of the District of Columbia at the time of their publication.

About University of the District of Columbia

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of the District of Columbia have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 37.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 19 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 178 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 68 papers in Signal Processing, 52 papers in Media Technology and 44 papers in Safety Research on the topics of Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (101 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (58 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (50 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (36 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (34 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (33 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (33 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Networks and Communications (3.9k citations), Signal Processing (1.4k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2.6k citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (434 citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.1k citations). Authors at University of the District of Columbia collaborate with scholars in United States, China and India and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Organometallic Chemistry, Sustainability, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, PLoS ONE and Applied Sciences. Some of University of the District of Columbia's most productive authors include Signithia Fordham, John U. Ogbu, Sherali Zeadally, Sherali Zeadally, Ruth Silverman, David M. Mount, Angela Y. Wu, Nathan S. Netanyahu, Sunil Arya and Vijaya L. Melnick.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact