Group Health Cooperative

3k papers receiving 250.8k citations

Peers

Group Health Cooperative
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Pharmacology 19.5k
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 2.5k
  • General Health Professions 26.7k
  • Family Practice 2.6k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 3.6k
Replace Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation with:
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation United States
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research United States
Harborview Medical Center United States
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute United States
BC Children's Hospital Canada
Washington State University Spokane United States
Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center United States
California Pacific Medical Center United States
Swedish Medical Center United States
Kaiser Permanente Northern California United States
Group Health Cooperative relative to Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation United States Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.9×
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Group Health Cooperative

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Group Health Cooperative. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Group Health Cooperative with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Group Health Cooperative more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Group Health Cooperative

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Group Health Cooperative at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Group Health Cooperative at the time of their publication.

About Group Health Cooperative

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Group Health Cooperative have published 3k papers, which have received a total of 251k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 333 papers in General Health Professions, 122 papers in Health Information Management, 45 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 178 papers in Pharmacology and 171 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism on the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (145 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (137 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (118 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (113 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (111 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (109 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (97 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (81 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmacology (19.5k citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (2.5k citations), General Health Professions (26.7k citations), Family Practice (2.6k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (3.6k citations). Authors at Group Health Cooperative collaborate with scholars in United States, Netherlands and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Medical Care, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine and PEDIATRICS. Some of Group Health Cooperative's most productive authors include Edward H. Wagner, Michael Von Korff, Gregory E. Simon, Wayne J. Katon, Eric B. Larson, Michael Von Korff, William Eric Barlow, Diana L. Miglioretti, Elizabeth H.B. Lin and Carolyn M. Rutter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact