Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Impact in
- Health top 1%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health disparities and outcomes
- Modeling and Simulation top 2%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
- Health 196
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy 109
- Top scholars
- Christopher J L MurrayTheo VosAlan D LópezHarvey WhitefordAbraham D. FlaxmanAlize J FerrariMohsen NaghaviMajid Ezzati
- Journals
- The Lancet (122 papers)PLoS ONE (81 papers)Population Health Metrics (62 papers)PLoS Medicine (36 papers)BMJ Open (34 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
1.5k papers receiving 109.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
- Health 10.7k
- Modeling and Simulation 4.2k
- Periodontics 3.8k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 22.3k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 8.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 174.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 196 papers in Health, 75 papers in Modeling and Simulation, 292 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 184 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 236 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (160 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (109 papers), Global Health Care Issues (97 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (90 papers), Malaria Research and Control (79 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (79 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (77 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Reforms (76 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (10.7k citations), Modeling and Simulation (4.2k citations), Periodontics (3.8k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (22.3k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (8.8k citations). Authors at Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including The Lancet, PLoS ONE, Population Health Metrics, PLoS Medicine and BMJ Open. Some of Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's most productive authors include Christopher J L Murray, Theo Vos, Alan D López, Harvey Whiteford, Abraham D. Flaxman, Alize J Ferrari, Mohsen Naghavi, Mohsen Naghavi, Majid Ezzati and Ali H. Mokdad.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.