California Pacific Medical Center

4.9k papers receiving 240.3k citations

Peers

California Pacific Medical Center
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Hepatology 15.8k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 15.8k
  • Physiology 32.0k
  • Oncology 32.2k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 4.0k
Replace VA Palo Alto Health Care System with:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System United States
San Francisco VA Medical Center United States
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center United States
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles United States
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System United States
University of California San Diego Medical Center United States
Portland VA Medical Center United States
University of Washington Medical Center United States
University of California, Irvine Medical Center United States
VA Puget Sound Health Care System United States
California Pacific Medical Center relative to VA Palo Alto Health Care System United States VA Palo Alto Health Care System's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at California Pacific Medical Center

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at California Pacific Medical Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at California Pacific Medical Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California Pacific Medical Center more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at California Pacific Medical Center

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with California Pacific Medical Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with California Pacific Medical Center at the time of their publication.

About California Pacific Medical Center

In recent decades, authors affiliated with California Pacific Medical Center have published 5.7k papers, which have received a total of 287.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 308 papers in Hepatology, 318 papers in Ophthalmology, 89 papers in Transplantation, 249 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 768 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Bone health and osteoporosis research (214 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (153 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (138 papers), Sleep and related disorders (132 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (132 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (125 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (121 papers) and Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (107 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Hepatology (15.8k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (15.8k citations), Physiology (32.0k citations), Oncology (32.2k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (4.0k citations). Authors at California Pacific Medical Center collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Journal of Clinical Oncology. Some of California Pacific Medical Center's most productive authors include Stephanie A. Studenski, Steven R. Cummings, Kristine E. Ensrud, Pierre‐Yves Desprez, Judith Campisi, Peggy M. Cawthon, Katie L. Stone, Luiz E. Bermudez, Jane A. Cauley and John A. Astin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact