Duke University

9.1M citations
185.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Duke University

176.5k papers receiving 9.1M citations

Peers

Duke University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 434.3k
  • Molecular Biology 912.9k
  • Virology 62.5k
  • General Decision Sciences 40.6k
  • Genetics 113.1k
Replace University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
University of Pittsburgh United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
Emory University United States
Columbia University United States
The Ohio State University United States
Cornell University United States
University of Virginia United States
New York University United States
Duke University relative to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Duke University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Duke University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Duke University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Duke University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Duke University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Duke University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Duke University at the time of their publication.

About Duke University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Duke University have published 185.2k papers, which have received a total of 9.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9.1k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 1.2k papers in Virology, 6k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 8.8k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 808 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1.7k papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1.3k papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (1.2k papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (1.2k papers), HIV Research and Treatment (1.2k papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1k papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1k papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (434.3k citations), Molecular Biology (912.9k citations), Virology (62.5k citations), General Decision Sciences (40.6k citations) and Genetics (113.1k citations). Authors at Duke University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, American Heart Journal and Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Some of Duke University's most productive authors include Robert J. Lefkowitz, Adrian Bejan, Robert Jackson, Campbell R. Harvey, Valarie A. Zeithaml, David R. Smith, Marc G. Caron, Weitao Yang, Nan Lin and William H. Schlesinger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact