University of Pittsburgh

10M citations
220.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

  • Surgery 16.5k
    • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes 1.9k
    • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 1.6k
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2.4k
    • Schizophrenia research and treatment 1.7k

University of Pittsburgh

211k papers receiving 10M citations

Peers

University of Pittsburgh
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 389k
  • Physiology 453.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 352.2k
  • Epidemiology 527.8k
  • Surgery 659.2k
Replace University of Toronto with:
University of Toronto Canada
University of Michigan United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
National Institutes of Health United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
Duke University United States
Columbia University United States
Cornell University United States
The Ohio State University United States
University of Pittsburgh relative to University of Toronto Canada University of Toronto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Toronto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Pittsburgh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Pittsburgh. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Pittsburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Pittsburgh more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Pittsburgh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Pittsburgh at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Pittsburgh at the time of their publication.

About University of Pittsburgh

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Pittsburgh have published 220.1k papers, which have received a total of 10M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 16.5k papers in Surgery, 6.8k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 1.2k papers in Transplantation, 2.9k papers in Emergency Medicine and 10.9k papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2.4k papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (1.9k papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1.7k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.6k papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (1.6k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.5k papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1.4k papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1.4k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (389k citations), Physiology (453.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (352.2k citations), Epidemiology (527.8k citations) and Surgery (659.2k citations). Authors at University of Pittsburgh collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Critical Care Medicine and Transplantation. Some of University of Pittsburgh's most productive authors include Thomas L. Saaty, Marilyn Kozak, Daniel J. Buysse, Charles F. Reynolds, Anthony A. Grace, John A. Kellum, Lewis H. Kuller, Derek C. Angus, David A. Lewis and Anne B. Newman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact