Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

64.2k citations
2.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

1.7k papers receiving 59.9k citations

Peers

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 5.5k
  • Neurology 2.3k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Immunology and Allergy 1.5k
  • Cell Biology 3.9k
Replace Westfälische Hochschule with:
Westfälische Hochschule Germany
University of Applied Sciences Mainz Germany
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences Germany
Dialyse Centrum Groningen Netherlands
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum Germany
Centre de Gestion Scientifique France
Schiller International University France
Fund for Scientific Research Belgium
University of Applied Sciences Leiden Netherlands
Clinical Research Center Kiel Germany
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft relative to Westfälische Hochschule Germany Westfälische Hochschule's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Westfälische Hochschule · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft at the time of their publication.

About Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 64.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 14 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 44 papers in Sensory Systems, 119 papers in Immunology, 27 papers in Algebra and Number Theory and 90 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (44 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (44 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (40 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (35 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (32 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (32 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (31 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (5.5k citations), Neurology (2.3k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Immunology and Allergy (1.5k citations) and Cell Biology (3.9k citations). Authors at Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Mathematische Nachrichten, European Journal of Immunology, Nuclear Physics A, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Critical Care Medicine. Some of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft's most productive authors include Siegfried Gähler, Jürgen Geiseler, Katarina Wolf, Peter Friedl, D. Wild, Bernhard Nieswandt, Rudolf Fahrig, H Motz, Ruth Brack‐Werner and Martin J. Lohse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact