Centre de Gestion Scientifique

103.8k citations
2.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Centre de Gestion Scientifique

2.7k papers receiving 102.2k citations

Peers

Centre de Gestion Scientifique
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Molecular Biology 26.5k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 4.8k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 6.4k
  • Immunology 6.5k
  • Virology 1.4k
Replace CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses with:
CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses France
Roche (France) France
Laboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale Supérieure France
Clermont Université France
Dartmouth Hospital United Kingdom
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Germany
Westfälische Hochschule Germany
Tecnologie Avanzate (Italy) Italy
Université de Lyon France
Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure France
Centre de Gestion Scientifique relative to CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses France CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Fontenay-aux-roses · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centre de Gestion Scientifique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre de Gestion Scientifique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre de Gestion Scientifique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre de Gestion Scientifique more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centre de Gestion Scientifique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre de Gestion Scientifique at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre de Gestion Scientifique at the time of their publication.

About Centre de Gestion Scientifique

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre de Gestion Scientifique have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 103.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 301 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 50 papers in Urban Studies, 104 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 53 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films and 485 papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (75 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (64 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (51 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (46 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (45 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (45 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (44 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (44 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (26.5k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (4.8k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (6.4k citations), Immunology (6.5k citations) and Virology (1.4k citations). Authors at Centre de Gestion Scientifique collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Electronics Letters, Nuclear Physics B, PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Language Resources and Evaluation. Some of Centre de Gestion Scientifique's most productive authors include Étienne C. Hirsch, Stéphane Hunot, Éric Ballot, Shenle Pan, Armand Hatchuel, J.-L. Gervais, G. Gouesbet, Benoît Weil, Franck Aggeri and Jean‐Michel Claverie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact