Fund for Scientific Research

174.0k citations
4.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Fund for Scientific Research

4.0k papers receiving 162.3k citations

Peers

Fund for Scientific Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Soil Science 13.4k
  • Transportation 4.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 14.5k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 12.5k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 4.5k
Replace Université Clermont Auvergne with:
Université Clermont Auvergne France
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté France
Universität Trier Germany
Université de Rouen Normandie France
University of Portsmouth United Kingdom
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Germany
University of Hertfordshire United Kingdom
Hasselt University Belgium
Science Oxford United Kingdom
Université de Franche-Comté France
Fund for Scientific Research relative to Université Clermont Auvergne France Université Clermont Auvergne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Université Clermont Auvergne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fund for Scientific Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fund for Scientific Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fund for Scientific Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fund for Scientific Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fund for Scientific Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fund for Scientific Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fund for Scientific Research at the time of their publication.

About Fund for Scientific Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fund for Scientific Research have published 4.4k papers, which have received a total of 174.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 362 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 229 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 159 papers in Soil Science, 198 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 84 papers in Earth-Surface Processes on the topics of Soil erosion and sediment transport (138 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (105 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (96 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (95 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (90 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (73 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (73 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (66 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (13.4k citations), Transportation (4.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (14.5k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (12.5k citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (4.5k citations). Authors at Fund for Scientific Research collaborate with scholars in Belgium, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Dairy Science, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, PLoS ONE and Geomorphology. Some of Fund for Scientific Research's most productive authors include Jean Poesen, Leslie L. Iversen, Jacques Glowinski, Gérard Govers, Marius Gilbert, Olivier Luminet, Patrick Meyfroidt, Steven Gillis, Thierry Van Cutsem and Steve Majerus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact