College of Charleston

157.3k citations
6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

College of Charleston

5.6k papers receiving 157.1k citations

Peers

College of Charleston
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Oceanography 5.8k
  • Paleontology 4.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.8k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 9.1k
  • Ecology 9.6k
Replace Georgia Southern University with:
Georgia Southern University United States
Appalachian State University United States
Florida Institute of Technology United States
Florida Atlantic University United States
U.S. National Science Foundation United States
Old Dominion University United States
Ohio University United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
American University United States
University of North Carolina at Greensboro United States
College of Charleston relative to Georgia Southern University United States Georgia Southern University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×7.0×
Georgia Southern University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at College of Charleston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at College of Charleston. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at College of Charleston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College of Charleston more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at College of Charleston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with College of Charleston at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with College of Charleston at the time of their publication.

About College of Charleston

In recent decades, authors affiliated with College of Charleston have published 6k papers, which have received a total of 157.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 100 papers in Computer Science Applications, 193 papers in Oceanography, 162 papers in Paleontology, 329 papers in Ecology and 145 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (136 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (118 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (109 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (86 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (85 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (73 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (73 papers) and Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (71 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (5.8k citations), Paleontology (4.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (9.1k citations) and Ecology (9.6k citations). Authors at College of Charleston collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, PLoS ONE, Zootaxa and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. Some of College of Charleston's most productive authors include John C. Crotts, Bing Pan, Shaun Nichols, Stephen Wayne Litvin, James Bryant Hittner, P. Chris Fragile, Robert T. Dillon, Ronald Earl Goldsmith, Allan E. Strand and Jaksa Jack Kivela.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact