College of Charleston

5.6k papers receiving 138.6k citations

Peers

College of Charleston
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Marketing 8.3k
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 1.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.1k
  • Oceanography 7.9k
  • Ecology 16.6k
Replace East Carolina University with:
East Carolina University United States
Georgia Southern University United States
University of North Carolina Wilmington United States
Appalachian State University United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States
Albany State University United States
University of North Carolina at Greensboro United States
Nova Southeastern University United States
University of North Florida United States
James Madison University United States
College of Charleston relative to East Carolina University United States East Carolina University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
East Carolina University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at College of Charleston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at College of Charleston. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at College of Charleston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College of Charleston more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at College of Charleston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with College of Charleston at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with College of Charleston at the time of their publication.

About College of Charleston

In recent decades, authors affiliated with College of Charleston have published 6.3k papers, which have received a total of 147.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 40 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 318 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 291 papers in Oceanography, 604 papers in Ecology and 187 papers in Marketing on the topics of Marine Biology and Ecology Research (147 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (139 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (132 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (119 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (117 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (115 papers), Marine and fisheries research (101 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (100 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Marketing (8.3k citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (1.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.1k citations), Oceanography (7.9k citations) and Ecology (16.6k citations). Authors at College of Charleston collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, PLoS ONE, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal of Travel Research and Zootaxa. Some of College of Charleston's most productive authors include John C. Crotts, Bing Pan, Shaun Nichols, Stephen W. Litvin, James B. Hittner, Robert T. Dillon, Ronald E. Goldsmith, Allan E. Strand, Jakša Kivela and Erik E. Sotka.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact