Nova Southeastern University

298k citations
13.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Nova Southeastern University

12.2k papers receiving 297.8k citations

Peers

Nova Southeastern University
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Oral Surgery 7k
  • Immunology and Allergy 5.5k
  • Oceanography 11.8k
  • Orthodontics 5.5k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 10.4k
Replace East Carolina University with:
East Carolina University United States
Florida Atlantic University United States
Wake Forest University United States
Florida International University United States
University of Mississippi United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore County United States
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis United States
University of South Alabama United States
University of Memphis United States
Nova Southeastern University relative to East Carolina University United States East Carolina University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.7×
East Carolina University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Nova Southeastern University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Nova Southeastern University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Nova Southeastern University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nova Southeastern University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Nova Southeastern University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Nova Southeastern University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Nova Southeastern University at the time of their publication.

About Nova Southeastern University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Nova Southeastern University have published 13.4k papers, which have received a total of 298k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 277 papers in Oral Surgery, 800 papers in Clinical Psychology, 151 papers in Applied Psychology, 293 papers in Oceanography and 160 papers in Periodontics on the topics of Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (386 papers), Online and Blended Learning (248 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (190 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (169 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (165 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (142 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (137 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (131 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oral Surgery (7k citations), Immunology and Allergy (5.5k citations), Oceanography (11.8k citations), Orthodontics (5.5k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (10.4k citations). Authors at Nova Southeastern University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Qualitative Report, PLoS ONE, Optometry and Vision Science, Coral Reefs and Scientific Reports. Some of Nova Southeastern University's most productive authors include John M. Longshore, Bernard M. Bass, Fuzhen Zhang, Bernhard Riegl, Yair M. Levy, Rebecca Abraham, Julian P. McCreary, Douglas Kalman, Linda Carter Sobell and HARVEY NORMAN MAYROVITZ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact