Nova Southeastern University

281.6k citations
13.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Nova Southeastern University

10.7k papers receiving 236.4k citations

Peers

Nova Southeastern University
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Oceanography 19.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 14.1k
  • Orthodontics 4.9k
  • Oral Surgery 7.8k
  • Clinical Psychology 24.5k
Replace Florida College with:
Florida College United States
Florida Atlantic University United States
Florida International University United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham United States
East Carolina University United States
Auburn University United States
Virginia Commonwealth University United States
United States Army United States
University of South Alabama United States
Nova Southeastern University relative to Florida College United States Florida College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Florida College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Nova Southeastern University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Nova Southeastern University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Nova Southeastern University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nova Southeastern University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Nova Southeastern University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Nova Southeastern University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Nova Southeastern University at the time of their publication.

About Nova Southeastern University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Nova Southeastern University have published 13.0k papers, which have received a total of 281.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.1k papers in Clinical Psychology, 263 papers in Oral Surgery, 539 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 501 papers in Oceanography and 122 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology on the topics of Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (501 papers), Marine and fisheries research (373 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (230 papers), Online and Blended Learning (220 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (213 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (201 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (155 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (148 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (19.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (14.1k citations), Orthodontics (4.9k citations), Oral Surgery (7.8k citations) and Clinical Psychology (24.5k citations). Authors at Nova Southeastern University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Optometry and Vision Science, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Coral Reefs and Frontiers in Marine Science. Some of Nova Southeastern University's most productive authors include John M. Longshore, Bernard M. Bass, Fuzhen Zhang, Bernhard Riegl, Yair Levy, Rebecca Abraham, Douglas Kalman, Julian P. McCreary, Linda C. Sobell and Harvey N. Mayrovitz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact