Virginia Braun
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 0.01%
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Gender Studies top 0.01%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 24
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 17
-
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 22
- Co-authors
- Victoria Clarke (60 shared papers)Nikki Hayfield (12 shared papers)Gareth Terry (15 shared papers)Nicola Gavey (10 shared papers)Panteá Farvid (8 shared papers)Celia Kitzinger (3 shared papers)Sue Wilkinson (3 shared papers)Debra Gray (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Feminism & Psychology (14 papers)Qualitative Research in Psychology (7 papers)Sexualities (5 papers)The Journal of Sex Research (3 papers)Qualitative Psychology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Virginia Braun
137 papers receiving 169.2k citations
Virginia Braun's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
- Clinical Psychology 25.5k
- Gender Studies 9.3k
- General Health Professions 22.3k
- Safety Research 7.3k
- Social Psychology 17.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Virginia Braun
This map shows the geographic impact of Virginia Braun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virginia Braun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia Braun more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Virginia Braun
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virginia Braun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virginia Braun. The network helps show where Virginia Braun may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Virginia Braun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Using thematic analysis in psychology Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 128382 |
| 2 | Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 11246 |
| 3 | One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 5508 |
| 4 | Thematic analysis. Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 5018 |
| 5 | Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 3440 |
| 6 | To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 2950 |
| 7 | Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 2465 |
| 8 | What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 2210 |
| 9 | Thematic Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 1947 |
| 10 | Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1916 |
| 11 | Thematic Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 1344 |
| 12 | Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 1328 |
| 13 | The online survey as a qualitative research tool Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 1031 |
| 14 | Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 685 |
| 15 | Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 481 |
| 16 | (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 400 |
| 17 | ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 375 |
| 18 | Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine : A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG) Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 365 |
| 19 | Thematic Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 339 |
| 20 | Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 334 |
About Virginia Braun
Virginia Braun is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 140 papers that have together received 176.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (24 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (22 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (17 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (17 papers), Community Health and Development (12 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (11 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (11 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (25.5k citations), Gender Studies (9.3k citations), General Health Professions (22.3k citations), Safety Research (7.3k citations) and Social Psychology (17.3k citations). Virginia Braun has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Victoria Clarke, Nikki Hayfield, Gareth Terry, Nicola Gavey, Panteá Farvid, Celia Kitzinger, Sue Wilkinson, Debra Gray, Victoria Clarke and Nicola M. Rance. Their work appears in journals such as Feminism & Psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Sexualities, The Journal of Sex Research and Qualitative Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.