Cincinnati Eye Institute
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 315
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 118
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 42
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 41
- Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research 38
-
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments 58
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 54
- Corneal surgery and disorders 49
- Top scholars
- Edward J. HollandRobert H. OsherRobert J. CionniKarl C. GolnikMichael E. SnyderChristopher D. RiemannRobert E. FosterClara C. Chan
- Journals
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (86 papers)Cornea (65 papers)Ophthalmology (55 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (30 papers)Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Cincinnati Eye Institute
591 papers receiving 16.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Ophthalmology 6.5k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 5.3k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2k
- Pharmaceutical Science 304
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 600
Countries citing scholars working at Cincinnati Eye Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Cincinnati Eye Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Cincinnati Eye Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cincinnati Eye Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Cincinnati Eye Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Cincinnati Eye Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Cincinnati Eye Institute at the time of their publication.
About Cincinnati Eye Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Cincinnati Eye Institute have published 638 papers, which have received a total of 16.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 315 papers in Ophthalmology, 162 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 95 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 37 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 49 papers in Surgery on the topics of Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (118 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (58 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (54 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (53 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (49 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (42 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (41 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (6.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (5.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (304 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (600 citations). Authors at Cincinnati Eye Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Cornea, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Some of Cincinnati Eye Institute's most productive authors include Edward J. Holland, Robert H. Osher, Robert J. Cionni, Karl C. Golnik, Michael E. Snyder, Christopher D. Riemann, Robert E. Foster, Clara C. Chan, Scott Burk and Robert A. Sisk.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.