Scott Burk
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
Papers in
-
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 6
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 6
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 3
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 8
- Co-authors
- Gary E. Shull (6 shared papers)David H. MacLennan (2 shared papers)Jonathan Lytton (2 shared papers)Andrea P. Da Mata (9 shared papers)Michael E. Snyder (6 shared papers)Robert E. Foster (7 shared papers)Marisa M. Westlin (1 shared paper)Robert H. Rosa (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ophthalmology (6 papers)Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (5 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (4 papers)Retina (2 papers)Genomics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilPortugal
In The Last Decade
Scott Burk
30 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Ophthalmology 594
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 761
- Sensory Systems 105
- Physiology 101
- Cell Biology 254
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Burk
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Burk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Burk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Burk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Burk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Burk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Burk. The network helps show where Scott Burk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Burk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 572 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 367 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 265 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 249 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 150 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 125 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 115 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 107 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 104 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 51 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 49 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 44 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 39 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 6 |
About Scott Burk
Scott Burk is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Management Information Systems, Molecular Biology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (8 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (2 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (594 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (761 citations), Sensory Systems (105 citations), Physiology (101 citations) and Cell Biology (254 citations). Scott Burk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Gary E. Shull, David H. MacLennan, Jonathan Lytton, Andrea P. Da Mata, Michael E. Snyder, Robert E. Foster, Marisa M. Westlin, Robert H. Rosa, Robert H. Osher and Michael R. Petersen. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Retina and Genomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.