Research to Prevent Blindness
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 333
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 74
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 73
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 56
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 52
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 40
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 105
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 47
- Top scholars
- William M. BourneJ. Bradley RandlemanHarry W. FlynnPeter S. HershNancy J. NewmanDouglas Donald KochJayanth S. SridharPhilip J. Rosenfeld
- Journals
- Cornea (94 papers)Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (84 papers)Retina (76 papers)Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (57 papers)Journal of Glaucoma (41 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyBrazil
In The Last Decade
Research to Prevent Blindness
565 papers receiving 12.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Ophthalmology 5.9k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 3.3k
- Neurology 630
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 890
- Endocrinology 93
Countries citing scholars working at Research to Prevent Blindness
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research to Prevent Blindness. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research to Prevent Blindness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research to Prevent Blindness more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Research to Prevent Blindness
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research to Prevent Blindness at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research to Prevent Blindness at the time of their publication.
About Research to Prevent Blindness
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research to Prevent Blindness have published 587 papers, which have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 333 papers in Ophthalmology, 169 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 30 papers in Neurology, 35 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 37 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Corneal surgery and disorders (105 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (74 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (73 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (56 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (52 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (47 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (40 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (32 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (5.9k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (3.3k citations), Neurology (630 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (890 citations) and Endocrinology (93 citations). Authors at Research to Prevent Blindness collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Cornea, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Retina, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Journal of Glaucoma. Some of Research to Prevent Blindness's most productive authors include William M. Bourne, J. Bradley Randleman, Harry W. Flynn, Peter S. Hersh, Nancy J. Newman, Douglas Donald Koch, Jayanth S. Sridhar, Philip J. Rosenfeld, William J. Feuer and Ajay E. Kuriyan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.