Robert E. Foster

154 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Robert E. Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
  • Ophthalmology 710
  • Developmental Neuroscience 301
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 868
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.0k
  • Developmental Biology 75
Replace H. Davson with:
H. Davson United Kingdom
Beth Burnside United States
Yasuhisa Nakamura Japan
William G. Ellis United States
Bruce M. Carlson United States
Zhimin Xu China
Glen Jeffery United Kingdom
E Finke United States
José A. Vega Spain
David J. Price United Kingdom
Robert E. Foster relative to H. Davson United Kingdom H. Davson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
H. Davson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Foster. The network helps show where Robert E. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Foster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Foster Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Foster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 160 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982262
2 2000258
3 2001241
4 1986147
5 1978123
6 1980123
7 2009121
8 1977112
9 1975105
10 1980104
11 2004103
12 198299
13 199295
14 201384
15 199880
16 198066
17 200862
18 200756
19 201454
20 198149

About Robert E. Foster

Robert E. Foster is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oceanography, Ophthalmology, Global and Planetary Change and Surgery, having authored 160 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and coastal ecosystems (29 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (23 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (10 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (9 papers), Water Quality Monitoring Technologies (8 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (8 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (710 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (301 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (868 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k citations) and Developmental Biology (75 citations). Robert E. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and France. Frequent co-authors include Stephen G. Waxman, William C. Hall, Christopher D. Riemann, Michael R. Petersen, Andrea P. Da Mata, Scott Burk, Michael E. Snyder, Robert H. Rosa, Barry W. Connors and Larry S. Benardo. Their work appears in journals such as Retina, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact