Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research

18.7k citations
741 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research

685 papers receiving 18.7k citations

Peers

Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 3k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 4.2k
  • Nephrology 670
  • Health Informatics 152
  • Cell Biology 727
Replace Kaleida Health with:
Kaleida Health United States
Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute Canada
Albany Stratton VA Medical Center Albany United States
CVPath Institute United States
Atlantic Health System United States
Covance (United States) United States
St. Thomas Hospital Canada
Main Line Health United States
Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU United States
Penn State Health Children's Hospital United States
Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research relative to Kaleida Health United States Kaleida Health's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.0×
Kaleida Health · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at the time of their publication.

About Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research have published 741 papers, which have received a total of 18.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 187 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 49 papers in Cell Biology, 109 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Health Informatics and 84 papers in Biomedical Engineering on the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (67 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (45 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (45 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (42 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (35 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (28 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (25 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (3k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (4.2k citations), Nephrology (670 citations), Health Informatics (152 citations) and Cell Biology (727 citations). Authors at Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Canadian Journal of Cardiology, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Acta Biomaterialia, Circulation Heart Failure and Scientific Reports. Some of Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research's most productive authors include Mansoor Husain, Craig A. Simmons, Heather Joan Ross, David Z.I. Cherney, Bruce A. Perkins, DAVID H. FITCHETT, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Slava Epelman, Rodrigo Fernández‐González and Patrick R. Lawler.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact