Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 321
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 162
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 55
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 43
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 34
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 17
-
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 44
- Corneal surgery and disorders 33
- Top scholars
- Jeffrey S. HeierDavid M. BrownPeter K. KaiserDavid S. BoyerPhilip J. RosenfeldCarol Y. ChungJudy P. SyMark Michels
- Journals
- Ophthalmology (94 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (34 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (33 papers)Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (28 papers)Retina (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
444 papers receiving 32.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
- Ophthalmology 26.3k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 4k
- Pharmaceutical Science 866
- Health Informatics 80
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston at the time of their publication.
About Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston have published 466 papers, which have received a total of 32.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 321 papers in Ophthalmology, 94 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 13 papers in Dermatology, 2 papers in Health Informatics and 27 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (162 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (55 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (44 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (43 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (34 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (33 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (22 papers) and Ocular Oncology and Treatments (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (26.3k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (4k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (866 citations), Health Informatics (80 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.5k citations). Authors at Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery and Retina. Some of Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston's most productive authors include Jeffrey S. Heier, David M. Brown, Peter K. Kaiser, David S. Boyer, Philip J. Rosenfeld, Carol Y. Chung, Judy P. Sy, Mark Michels, Roger F. Steinert and Bradford J. Shingleton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.