Boston Consulting Group (United States)
Impact in
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Quality and Supply Management
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Business Strategy and Innovation
Papers in
-
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 16
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 15
- Healthcare Policy and Management 7
-
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 8
- Top scholars
- George StalkThomas M. HoutHamilton MosesDaniel L. CivcoJason R. ParentDavid PotereShlomo AngelDavid H. M. Matheson
- Journals
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (29 papers)JAMA (6 papers)Drug Discovery Today (5 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (3 papers)JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Boston Consulting Group (United States)
241 papers receiving 8.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
- Management Information Systems 917
- Strategy and Management 1.5k
- Management of Technology and Innovation 617
- Health Informatics 103
- Economics and Econometrics 1.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Boston Consulting Group (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Boston Consulting Group (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Boston Consulting Group (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boston Consulting Group (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Boston Consulting Group (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Boston Consulting Group (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Boston Consulting Group (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Boston Consulting Group (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Boston Consulting Group (United States) have published 321 papers, which have received a total of 11.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 55 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 31 papers in Strategy and Management, 2 papers in General Engineering, 15 papers in Accounting and 13 papers in Management Information Systems on the topics of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (16 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Oil and Gas Production Techniques (9 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (7 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management Information Systems (917 citations), Strategy and Management (1.5k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (617 citations), Health Informatics (103 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (1.3k citations). Authors at Boston Consulting Group (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, JAMA, Drug Discovery Today, Alzheimer s & Dementia and JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. Some of Boston Consulting Group (United States)'s most productive authors include George Stalk, Thomas M. Hout, Hamilton Moses, Daniel L. Civco, Jason R. Parent, David Potere, Shlomo Angel, David H. M. Matheson, Earl Ray Dorsey and Stefan Larsson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.