Ernst & Young (United States)
Impact in
-
- Quality and Supply Management
- Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Papers in
- Accounting 45
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 19
- Corporate Finance and Governance 13
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 11
-
- Quality and Supply Management 13
- Top scholars
- John W. KamauffRobert E. SpekmanJ.R. DeShazoE. Tory HigginsRuth KleinTimothy J. StraumanH. James HarringtonMona El-Ghobashy
- Journals
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (28 papers)Radiology (21 papers)Complexity (9 papers)The Journal of Urology (8 papers)Psychiatric Quarterly (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelIndia
In The Last Decade
Ernst & Young (United States)
423 papers receiving 11.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
- Management Information Systems 1.8k
- Strategy and Management 2.2k
- General Decision Sciences 229
- Accounting 1.3k
- Management Science and Operations Research 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Ernst & Young (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ernst & Young (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ernst & Young (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst & Young (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Ernst & Young (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ernst & Young (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ernst & Young (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Ernst & Young (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ernst & Young (United States) have published 600 papers, which have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 45 papers in Accounting, 34 papers in Management Information Systems, 77 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 43 papers in Strategy and Management and 11 papers in Health Information Management on the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (19 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (18 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers), Quality and Supply Management (13 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (11 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (11 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management Information Systems (1.8k citations), Strategy and Management (2.2k citations), General Decision Sciences (229 citations), Accounting (1.3k citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (1.1k citations). Authors at Ernst & Young (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Israel and India and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Radiology, Complexity, The Journal of Urology and Psychiatric Quarterly. Some of Ernst & Young (United States)'s most productive authors include John W. Kamauff, Robert E. Spekman, J.R. DeShazo, E. Tory Higgins, Ruth Klein, Timothy J. Strauman, H. James Harrington, Mona El-Ghobashy, Victor Herbert and Louis W. Sullivan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.