Office of the Secretary of Defense

11.1k citations
501 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Office of the Secretary of Defense

383 papers receiving 9.4k citations

Peers

Office of the Secretary of Defense
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Information Systems and Management 816
  • Parasitology 674
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.3k
  • General Decision Sciences 136
  • Emergency Medicine 625
Replace Office of Management with:
Office of Management United States
National Academy of Engineering United States
Carnegie Hall United States
University of Tennessee System United States
Office of Disease Prevention United States
Consumers Union United States
Dayton Clinical Oncology Program United States
Goldman Sachs (United States) United States
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute United States
Systems Analytics (United States) United States
Office of the Secretary of Defense relative to Office of Management United States Office of Management's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Office of Management · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Office of the Secretary of Defense

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office of the Secretary of Defense. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office of the Secretary of Defense with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office of the Secretary of Defense more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Office of the Secretary of Defense

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office of the Secretary of Defense at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office of the Secretary of Defense at the time of their publication.

About Office of the Secretary of Defense

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office of the Secretary of Defense have published 501 papers, which have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 28 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 11 papers in Occupational Therapy, 17 papers in Parasitology, 8 papers in Toxicology and 1 paper in Nuclear Energy and Engineering on the topics of Disaster Response and Management (22 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (17 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (15 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (15 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (14 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (14 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (12 papers) and Technology Assessment and Management (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Information Systems and Management (816 citations), Parasitology (674 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (1.3k citations), General Decision Sciences (136 citations) and Emergency Medicine (625 citations). Authors at Office of the Secretary of Defense collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and South Africa and have published in prestigious journals including Systematic and Applied Acarology, Survival, The Washington Quarterly, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care and Military Medicine. Some of Office of the Secretary of Defense's most productive authors include Gordon B. Crawford, Tor Guimãrães, Magid Igbaria, Gordon B. Davis, Peter A. Morris, Keith J. Crocker, John T. Warner, Saul Pleeter, Douglas A. Hale and Richard George Robbins.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact