Consumers Union

16.9k citations
682 papers ·

Impact in

    • Sinusitis and nasal conditions
    • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Marketing top 10%
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
    • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies

Papers in

Consumers Union

498 papers receiving 13.3k citations

Peers

Consumers Union
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Otorhinolaryngology 1.4k
  • Marketing 1.3k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 848
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 123
  • Sensory Systems 331
Replace Thomson Reuters (United States) with:
Thomson Reuters (United States) United States
Atlantic University United States
Kelly Services (United States) United States
Northwood University United States
AARP United States
Mitchell College United States
Somerset Medical Center United States
Health Decisions (United States) United States
Methodist University United States
Hyattsville Community Development Corporation United States
Consumers Union relative to Thomson Reuters (United States) United States Thomson Reuters (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.9×
Thomson Reuters (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Consumers Union

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Consumers Union. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Consumers Union with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Consumers Union more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Consumers Union

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Consumers Union at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Consumers Union at the time of their publication.

About Consumers Union

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Consumers Union have published 682 papers, which have received a total of 16.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Marketing, 14 papers in Otorhinolaryngology, 55 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Forestry and 21 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management on the topics of Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (23 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (19 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (14 papers), Power System Optimization and Stability (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (12 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Otorhinolaryngology (1.4k citations), Marketing (1.3k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (848 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (123 citations) and Sensory Systems (331 citations). Authors at Consumers Union collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Otolaryngology, Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi), The Medical Journal of Australia, Teoría y Realidad Constitucional and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space. Some of Consumers Union's most productive authors include Edoardo Aromataris, Alan Pearson, Dagmara Riitano, Maureen D. Corrigan, Michelle A. Morganosky, Brenda J. Cude, Jawad S. Touma, Judith Streak Gomersall, Kylie Porritt and Craig Lockwood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact