National Academy of Medicine
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health and Medical Education
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Public Health Policies and Education 25
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 26
- Top scholars
- Allison A. YatesMary I. PoosSandra A. SchlickerPaula R. TrumboVictor J. DzauHarvey V. FinebergRuth Ellen BulgerKathleen N Lohr
- Journals
- JAMA (42 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (38 papers)The Lancet (31 papers)Health Affairs (18 papers)Science (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNepalSweden
In The Last Decade
National Academy of Medicine
721 papers receiving 44.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- General Health Professions 7.2k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 3.6k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8.8k
- Health Information Management 1.9k
- Health Informatics 408
Countries citing scholars working at National Academy of Medicine
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Academy of Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Academy of Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Academy of Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Academy of Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Academy of Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Academy of Medicine at the time of their publication.
About National Academy of Medicine
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Academy of Medicine have published 753 papers, which have received a total of 44.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 144 papers in General Health Professions, 51 papers in Health Information Management, 13 papers in Health Informatics, 183 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects on the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (50 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (38 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (26 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (25 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (25 papers), Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies (24 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (21 papers) and Global Security and Public Health (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (7.2k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (3.6k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (8.8k citations), Health Information Management (1.9k citations) and Health Informatics (408 citations). Authors at National Academy of Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Nepal and Sweden and have published in prestigious journals including JAMA, New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, Health Affairs and Science. Some of National Academy of Medicine's most productive authors include Allison A. Yates, Mary I. Poos, Sandra A. Schlicker, Paula R. Trumbo, Victor J. Dzau, Harvey V. Fineberg, Ruth Ellen Bulger, Kathleen N Lohr, Marilyn J. Field and Audrey Smedley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.