National Academy of Medicine
Impact in
- Emergency Medical Services top 5%
- Global Health Workforce Issues
- Endocrinology top 10%
- Vibrio bacteria research studies
Papers in
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 22
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 20
- Top scholars
- Harvey V. FinebergRuth Ellen BulgerVictor J. DzauHerbert M. SwickMarilyn J. FieldJohn J. MekalanosBrian D. SmedleyAudrey Smedley
- Journals
- JAMA (29 papers)Scientific Reports (22 papers)The Lancet (22 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (17 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandSweden
In The Last Decade
National Academy of Medicine
1.2k papers receiving 39.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
- Emergency Medical Services 1.3k
- Endocrinology 985
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 5.1k
- General Health Professions 4.4k
- Family Practice 266
Countries citing scholars working at National Academy of Medicine
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Academy of Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Academy of Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Academy of Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Academy of Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Academy of Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Academy of Medicine at the time of their publication.
About National Academy of Medicine
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Academy of Medicine have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 47.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 118 papers in General Health Professions, 71 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 92 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 112 papers in Oncology and 109 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (26 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (22 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (21 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (20 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (20 papers), Renal and related cancers (16 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (15 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Emergency Medical Services (1.3k citations), Endocrinology (985 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (5.1k citations), General Health Professions (4.4k citations) and Family Practice (266 citations). Authors at National Academy of Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Poland and Sweden and have published in prestigious journals including JAMA, Scientific Reports, The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of National Academy of Medicine's most productive authors include Harvey V. Fineberg, Ruth Ellen Bulger, Victor J. Dzau, Herbert M. Swick, Marilyn J. Field, John J. Mekalanos, Brian D. Smedley, Audrey Smedley, R. John Collier and Kathleen N Lohr.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.