New York Academy of Medicine

71.5k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

    • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
    • Migration, Health and Trauma
    • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health top 5%
    • Health disparities and outcomes

Papers in

New York Academy of Medicine

1.5k papers receiving 56.9k citations

Peers

New York Academy of Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Clinical Psychology 12.1k
  • Health 4.3k
  • Emergency Medical Services 2.9k
  • General Health Professions 10.5k
  • Hepatology 2.9k
Replace Westat (United States) with:
Westat (United States) United States
Health Resources and Services Administration United States
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality United States
New England Research Institutes United States
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center United States
United Nations Children's Fund United States
World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas United States
Community Health Center United States
Abt Global (United States) United States
VA NY Harbor Healthcare System United States
New York Academy of Medicine relative to Westat (United States) United States Westat (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Westat (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at New York Academy of Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at New York Academy of Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at New York Academy of Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New York Academy of Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at New York Academy of Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with New York Academy of Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with New York Academy of Medicine at the time of their publication.

About New York Academy of Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with New York Academy of Medicine have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 71.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 108 papers in Health, 19 papers in Family Practice, 257 papers in General Health Professions, 67 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 45 papers in Virology on the topics of HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (168 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (125 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (70 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (65 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (53 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (43 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (43 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (42 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (12.1k citations), Health (4.3k citations), Emergency Medical Services (2.9k citations), General Health Professions (10.5k citations) and Hepatology (2.9k citations). Authors at New York Academy of Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, Poland and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Urban Health, JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Heredity and AIDS and Behavior. Some of New York Academy of Medicine's most productive authors include Sandro Galea, David Vlahov, Joseph A. Boscarino, Roz D. Lasker, Steffanie A. Strathdee, Jennifer Ahern, Richard E. Adams, John Beard, Danielle C. Ompad and Arijit Nandi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact