Zsófia Nemoda

71 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Zsófia Nemoda
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Biological Psychiatry 169
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 167
  • Clinical Psychology 818
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 510
  • Physiology 148
Replace Anna Székely with:
Anna Székely Hungary
Liz Forty United Kingdom
Jens R. Wendland United States
Valentim Gentil Brazil
Keila Maria Mendes Ceresér Brazil
Nori Takei Japan
Genichi Sugihara Japan
Masatsugu Tsujii Japan
Rudie Kortekaas Netherlands
Nicole King Canada
Zsófia Nemoda relative to Anna Székely Hungary Anna Székely's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Anna Székely · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zsófia Nemoda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zsófia Nemoda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zsófia Nemoda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zsófia Nemoda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zsófia Nemoda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zsófia Nemoda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zsófia Nemoda. The network helps show where Zsófia Nemoda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zsófia Nemoda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zsófia Nemoda Line = papers co-authored together Zsófia Nemoda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000124
2 201790
3 201888
4 200283
5 200781
6 201581
7 200381
8 200680
9 200879
10 200074
11 200966
12 200866
13 201160
14 200455
15 201054
16 200753
17 201049
18 200349
19 201247
20 200746

About Zsófia Nemoda

Zsófia Nemoda is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (22 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (11 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (11 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (8 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (5 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (169 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (818 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (510 citations) and Physiology (148 citations). Zsófia Nemoda has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mária Sasvári‐Székely, Zsolt Rónai, Judit Gervai, Anna Székely, Krisztina Lakatos, Miklós Sahin‐Tóth, Ildikó Tóth, Moshe Szyf, Krisztina Ney and Zsanett Tárnok. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics, Molecular Psychiatry, Electrophoresis, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact