Zsófia Csajbók

23 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Zsófia Csajbók
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Health 30
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
  • Social Psychology 50
Replace Theodore F. Robles with:
Theodore F. Robles United States
Paula Pávez Chile
Joachim Kowalski Poland
Aleksandra Piejka Poland
Jessica Bryant United States
Parisa Parsafar United States
Karen Hasselmo United States
Alberto Collazzoni Italy
Sonya SooHoo United States
Marjolein Missler Netherlands
Zsófia Csajbók relative to Theodore F. Robles United States Theodore F. Robles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Theodore F. Robles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zsófia Csajbók

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zsófia Csajbók's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zsófia Csajbók with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zsófia Csajbók more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zsófia Csajbók

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zsófia Csajbók. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zsófia Csajbók. The network helps show where Zsófia Csajbók may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zsófia Csajbók, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zsófia Csajbók Line = papers co-authored together Zsófia Csajbók links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202067
2 201939
3 202124
4 201723
5 202117
6 202215
7 202312
8 202112
9 201911
10 20219
11 20238
12 20188
13 20226
14 20234
15 20243
16 20233
17 20223
18 20223
19 20223
20 20222

About Zsófia Csajbók

Zsófia Csajbók is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Marketing and Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Psychology of Social Influence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations), Health (30 citations), Biological Psychiatry (7 citations) and Social Psychology (50 citations). Zsófia Csajbók has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Pavla Čermáková, Mihály Berkics, Tomáš Formánek, Dag Aarsland, Sarah E. Tom, Anna Kågström, Jan Havlı́ček, Stefan Sieber, Stéphane Cullati and Boris Cheval. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Scientific Reports, European Psychiatry, Translational Psychiatry and Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact