Ying‐Jui Ho

84 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ying‐Jui Ho
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Biological Psychiatry 160
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 213
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 722
  • Developmental Neuroscience 127
  • Neurology 218
Replace Emilio Fernández‐Espejo with:
Emilio Fernández‐Espejo Spain
Larisa Bobrovskaya Australia
Maria Teresa Viscomi Italy
Patrícia S. Brocardo Brazil
Elaine Aparecida Del Bel Brazil
Theo Meert Belgium
Kyoung‐Shim Kim South Korea
Reza Rahimian Iran
Pablo Pandolfo Brazil
Maria Grazia Morgese Italy
Ying‐Jui Ho relative to Emilio Fernández‐Espejo Spain Emilio Fernández‐Espejo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Emilio Fernández‐Espejo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ying‐Jui Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ying‐Jui Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ying‐Jui Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ying‐Jui Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ying‐Jui Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ying‐Jui Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ying‐Jui Ho. The network helps show where Ying‐Jui Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ying‐Jui Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ying‐Jui Ho Line = papers co-authored together Ying‐Jui Ho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002167
2 201181
3 201971
4 201162
5 200361
6 201456
7 201255
8 200655
9 201054
10 201454
11 200950
12 200947
13 201244
14 200042
15 201241
16 200841
17 201137
18 200337
19 201537
20 200535

About Ying‐Jui Ho

Ying‐Jui Ho is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (25 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (14 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (11 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (11 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (160 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (213 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (722 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (127 citations) and Neurology (218 citations). Ying‐Jui Ho has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Cornelius R. Pawlak, Rainer K.W. Schwarting, Chih‐Li Lin, Te‐Jen Lai, Wen‐Chieh Liao, Peggy Schneider, Rainer Spanagel, Tamara G. Amstislavskaya, Ying‐Ming Liou and Ching‐Sui Hung. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Physiology & Behavior and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact