Xing‐De Wu
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 41
- Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids 15
- Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties 12
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 21
- Co-authors
- Qin‐Shi Zhao (96 shared papers)Li‐Yan Peng (57 shared papers)Juan He (31 shared papers)Liao‐Bin Dong (22 shared papers)Jia Su (25 shared papers)Lin‐Fen Ding (29 shared papers)Liu‐Dong Song (27 shared papers)Xiao Cheng (20 shared papers)
- Journals
- Fitoterapia (15 papers)Chemistry & Biodiversity (13 papers)Natural Products and Bioprospecting (11 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (10 papers)Phytochemistry (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Xing‐De Wu
110 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Pharmacology 488
- Pharmacology 207
- Complementary and alternative medicine 160
- Biochemistry 114
- Organic Chemistry 409
Countries citing papers authored by Xing‐De Wu
This map shows the geographic impact of Xing‐De Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xing‐De Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xing‐De Wu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Xing‐De Wu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xing‐De Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xing‐De Wu. The network helps show where Xing‐De Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Xing‐De Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 24 |
About Xing‐De Wu
Xing‐De Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 113 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (41 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (27 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (21 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (15 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (15 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (14 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (12 papers) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (488 citations), Pharmacology (207 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (160 citations), Biochemistry (114 citations) and Organic Chemistry (409 citations). Xing‐De Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Qin‐Shi Zhao, Li‐Yan Peng, Juan He, Liao‐Bin Dong, Jia Su, Lin‐Fen Ding, Liu‐Dong Song, Xiao Cheng, Juan He and Xiao‐Nian Li. Their work appears in journals such as Fitoterapia, Chemistry & Biodiversity, Natural Products and Bioprospecting, Tetrahedron Letters and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.