Ping Lin

2.8k citations
135 papers · 2.3k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Lin

125 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Ping Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Inorganic Chemistry 961
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 657
  • Materials Chemistry 924
  • Computational Mechanics 298
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 117
Replace Qiang Sun with:
Qiang Sun China
Weizhong Chen China
Lars R. Furenlid United States
M. Bonin Switzerland
Tian Ma China
Ruili Zhang China
Linghong Lu China
Adrià Gil Spain
Mitsuru Uesaka Japan
Ping Lin relative to Qiang Sun China Qiang Sun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Qiang Sun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Lin. The network helps show where Ping Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ping Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012153
2 2009114
3 201390
4 200380
5 201177
6 201561
7 201561
8 200957
9 200657
10 200754
11 201852
12 201349
13 201449
14 200246
15 201443
16 201743
17 201342
18 201541
19 201341
20 201738

About Ping Lin

Ping Lin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Computational Mechanics, Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Molecular Biology, having authored 135 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (23 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (21 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (20 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (9 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (8 papers), Landslides and related hazards (8 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (8 papers) and Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (961 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (657 citations), Materials Chemistry (924 citations), Computational Mechanics (298 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (117 citations). Ping Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shaowu Du, Huabin Zhang, Chong‐Bin Tian, Lei Yang, Xiao-Chen Shan, Jian‐Di Lin, Zhihua Li, Xintao Wu, Xifa Long and En Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Polyhedron, Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Communications, Granular Matter and Nuclear Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact