Lin‐Fen Ding
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Magnolia and Illicium research
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 9
- Plant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity 9
- Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids 5
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 6
- Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species 4
- Co-authors
- Xing‐De Wu (28 shared papers)Qin‐Shi Zhao (22 shared papers)Liu‐Dong Song (23 shared papers)Li‐Yan Peng (9 shared papers)Jia Su (4 shared papers)Wei Nie (8 shared papers)Hui Yang (3 shared papers)Zheng‐Hong Pan (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Chemistry & Biodiversity (8 papers)Phytochemistry Letters (6 papers)Phytochemistry (6 papers)Journal of Asian Natural Products Research (3 papers)Organic Chemistry Frontiers (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- China
In The Last Decade
Lin‐Fen Ding
32 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Rehabilitation 46
- Complementary and alternative medicine 41
- Cancer Research 71
- Pharmacology 55
- Molecular Biology 221
Countries citing papers authored by Lin‐Fen Ding
This map shows the geographic impact of Lin‐Fen Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lin‐Fen Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lin‐Fen Ding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lin‐Fen Ding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lin‐Fen Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lin‐Fen Ding. The network helps show where Lin‐Fen Ding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lin‐Fen Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 6 |
About Lin‐Fen Ding
Lin‐Fen Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Rehabilitation and Pharmacology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (9 papers), Plant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity (9 papers), Magnolia and Illicium research (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (6 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (5 papers), Biological Stains and Phytochemicals (5 papers) and Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (46 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (41 citations), Cancer Research (71 citations), Pharmacology (55 citations) and Molecular Biology (221 citations). Lin‐Fen Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Xing‐De Wu, Qin‐Shi Zhao, Liu‐Dong Song, Li‐Yan Peng, Jia Su, Wei Nie, Hui Yang, Zheng‐Hong Pan, Shuangyan Wang and Juan He. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry & Biodiversity, Phytochemistry Letters, Phytochemistry, Journal of Asian Natural Products Research and Organic Chemistry Frontiers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.