Xiaojing Kong

11 papers receiving 633 citations

Peers

Xiaojing Kong
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Management Science and Operations Research 261
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 228
  • Computer Science Applications 96
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 149
  • Statistics and Probability 70
Replace Ulf Kroehne with:
Ulf Kroehne Germany
Sascha Wüstenberg Luxembourg
Andreas Fischer Germany
Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley United States
Anthony J. Nitko United States
Kathleen Scalise United States
Holger Brandt Germany
Mary Pommerich United States
Edys Quellmalz United States
Norbert M. Seel Germany
Xiaojing Kong relative to Ulf Kroehne Germany Ulf Kroehne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Ulf Kroehne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaojing Kong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaojing Kong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaojing Kong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaojing Kong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaojing Kong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaojing Kong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaojing Kong. The network helps show where Xiaojing Kong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Xiaojing Kong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaojing Kong Line = papers co-authored together Xiaojing Kong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005428
2 2007124
3 2009113
4 202032
5 201612
6 201510
7 20178
8 20177
9
Using response time and the effort -moderated model to investigate the effects of rapid guessing on estimation of item and person parameters
20076
10 20172
11
Does Size Matter? A Study on the Use of Netbooks in K-12 Assessments
20111

About Xiaojing Kong

Xiaojing Kong is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Gender Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education and Information Systems, having authored 11 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (4 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Innovations in Educational Methods (1 paper) and School Choice and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (261 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (228 citations), Computer Science Applications (96 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (149 citations) and Statistics and Probability (70 citations). Xiaojing Kong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Steven L. Wise, Dennison S. Bhola, Dena A. Pastor, Qinghai Zhang, Lei Xie, Lihong Chai, Yuhui Zhang, Jingfei Liu, Hongyuan Wang and Mengxing Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Measurement in Education, Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, Educational Assessment, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis and Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact