Xiaochen Chen

599 citations
19 papers · 382 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Xiaochen Chen

16 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Xiaochen Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Clinical Psychology 117
  • Social Psychology 100
  • Sociology and Political Science 201
  • Education 112
  • Applied Psychology 17
Replace Kimberley Radmacher with:
Kimberley Radmacher United States
Chunyong Yuan China
Rob Gommans Netherlands
Bahtiyar Eraslan Çapan Türkiye
Baoyu Bai China
Xue-Qin Yin China
David Sirlopú Chile
Calogero Iacolino Italy
Mingzhong Wang China
Lucila Ramos‐Sánchez United States
Xiaochen Chen relative to Kimberley Radmacher United States Kimberley Radmacher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Kimberley Radmacher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Xiaochen Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Xiaochen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiaochen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiaochen Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Xiaochen Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiaochen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiaochen Chen. The network helps show where Xiaochen Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Xiaochen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Xiaochen Chen Line = papers co-authored together Xiaochen Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2020116
2 201959
3 202151
4 201544
5 201222
6 201718
7 202012
8 201812
9 202110
10 202010
11 20189
12 20247
13 20234
14 20233
15 20193
16 20222
17 20250
18 20240
19 20200

About Xiaochen Chen

Xiaochen Chen is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (117 citations), Social Psychology (100 citations), Sociology and Political Science (201 citations), Education (112 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Xiaochen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Graham, Xinli Chi, Bin‐Bin Chen, Yang Qu, Tianyou Guo, Xiaofeng Liu, Xiaoyuan Wang, Zhan Hu, Zhongwei Wang and Xue Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research on Adolescence, Social Development, Social Psychology of Education, Addictive Behaviors and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact