Wolfram Bender

33 papers receiving 953 citations

Peers

Wolfram Bender
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Biological Psychiatry 129
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 76
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 296
  • Pharmacology 319
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
Replace Jennifer C. Vessicchio with:
Jennifer C. Vessicchio United States
Jürgen De Fruyt Belgium
Rebecca Schennach-Wolff Germany
Mocrane Abbar France
E Tricamo United States
Marie‐France Poirier France
Robert E. McCue United States
Virginia Tuckwell Australia
Shane McInerney Canada
Frederick Quitkin United States
Wolfram Bender relative to Jennifer C. Vessicchio United States Jennifer C. Vessicchio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jennifer C. Vessicchio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfram Bender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfram Bender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfram Bender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfram Bender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfram Bender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfram Bender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfram Bender. The network helps show where Wolfram Bender may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wolfram Bender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wolfram Bender Line = papers co-authored together Wolfram Bender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010225
2 2008141
3 2006115
4 201165
5 201059
6 198447
7 200847
8 201735
9 201434
10 198431
11 200830
12 201222
13 201020
14 201019
15 200618
16 201218
17 201115
18 197111
19
[Music therapy with psychiatric problem patients].
198311
20 19927

About Wolfram Bender

Wolfram Bender is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (12 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (6 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (129 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (76 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (296 citations), Pharmacology (319 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations). Wolfram Bender has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Florian Seemüller, Mazda Adli, Isabella Heuser, Michael Riedel, Wolfgang Gäebel, Michael Bauer, Peter Brieger, Michael Obermeier, Joachim Zeiler and Hans‐Jürgen Möller. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Journal of Affective Disorders, Pharmacopsychiatry, European Neuropsychopharmacology and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact