William William

28 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers

William William
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Otorhinolaryngology 13
  • Accounting 28
  • Oncology 59
  • Immunology 34
  • Urology 10
Replace James Ng with:
James Ng United States
Brandon Tan United States
Leili Zarifmahmoudi Iran
Jiayue Du China
Mike Brewster United Kingdom
Yongwei Chen China
Xiuhe Zou China
Hilal Ahmad Wani India
Richard de Boer Australia
Waqas Amin United States
William William relative to James Ng United States James Ng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James Ng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William William

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William William's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William William with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William William more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William William

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William William. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William William. The network helps show where William William may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William William, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William William Line = papers co-authored together William William links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202258
2 201646
3
ANALISIS PENGARUH GROWTH OPPORTUNITY, NET WORKING CAPITAL, DAN CASH CONVERSION CYCLE TERHADAP CASH HOLDINGS PERUSAHAAN SEKTOR PERTAMBANGAN
201324
4 202118
5 201310
6 20167
7 20236
8 20224
9 20174
10 20243
11 20183
12 19983
13 20232
14 20202
15 20222
16 20112
17 20252
18 20231
19
Ikan zebra (Danio rerio) dan Kegunaanya dalam Penelitian Fisiologi
20171
20 20171

About William William

William William is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Education and Strategy and Management, having authored 42 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Optimization Techniques (4 papers), Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning (4 papers), Public Health and Nutrition (4 papers), Edcuational Technology Systems (3 papers), Decision Support System Applications (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), SMEs Development and Digital Marketing (3 papers) and Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (13 citations), Accounting (28 citations), Oncology (59 citations), Immunology (34 citations) and Urology (10 citations). William William has collaborated with scholars based in Indonesia, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Frank V. Fossella, Susan Frisbee‐Hume, David Hui, George A. Eapen, Charles Lu, Éduardo Bruera, Katherine M.W. Pisters, Anne S. Tsao, Minjeong Park and Sapna Amin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Artificial Organs, International Journal of Impotence Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology and World Journal of Stem Cells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact