William T. Walker
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 9
- History 9
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 7
- Co-authors
- J. M. Beattie (1 shared paper)Susan Staves (1 shared paper)Andrew Charlesworth (1 shared paper)Kevin McCormack (1 shared paper)William C. Johnson (1 shared paper)David Underdown (1 shared paper)Steven Mintz (1 shared paper)Christopher Hill (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sixteenth Century Journal (13 papers)History of Political Thought (1 paper)International Journal of Production Research (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)Anglican and Episcopal history (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William T. Walker
30 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- History 176
- Classics 24
- Anthropology 63
- Economics and Econometrics 164
- History and Philosophy of Science 23
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Walker. The network helps show where William T. Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside William T. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 194 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 38 | |
| 4 | Supply Chain Networks and Business Process Orientation: Advanced Strategies and Best Practices | 2002 | 37 |
| 5 | 1983 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 12 | RETHINKING THE REVERSE SUPPLY CHAIN | 2000 | 6 |
| 13 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 19 | Walsingham and the English Imagination | 2013 | 3 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3 |
About William T. Walker
William T. Walker is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, History, Management Information Systems, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (9 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (7 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Comics and Graphic Narratives (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (176 citations), Classics (24 citations), Anthropology (63 citations), Economics and Econometrics (164 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (23 citations). William T. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Beattie, Susan Staves, Andrew Charlesworth, Kevin McCormack, William C. Johnson, David Underdown, Steven Mintz, Christopher Hill and Ann Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, History of Political Thought, International Journal of Production Research, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Anglican and Episcopal history.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.