William Scarth

465 citations
48 papers · 282 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Scarth

38 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

William Scarth
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 192
  • Economics and Econometrics 233
  • Finance 75
  • Accounting 23
  • General Energy 1
Replace Martin F. J. Prachowny with:
Martin F. J. Prachowny Canada
Daniel Himarios United States
Mark Toma United States
Allen Sinai United States
Raymond E. Lombra United States
Mário Henrique Simonsen United States
Bankim Chadha United States
Magdalena Polan Belgium
Roland Ricart France
Juha Tervala Finland
William Scarth relative to Martin F. J. Prachowny Canada Martin F. J. Prachowny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Martin F. J. Prachowny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Scarth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Scarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Scarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Scarth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Scarth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Scarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Scarth. The network helps show where William Scarth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside William Scarth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Scarth Line = papers co-authored together William Scarth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198954
2 199524
3 198423
4 198714
5 198913
6 198012
7 198711
8 198011
9 197910
10 19738
11 19938
12 19807
13 19847
14 20006
15 19756
16
Population Aging, Productivity, and Living Standards
20025
17 19775
18
Macroeconomics: The Development of Modern Methods for Policy Analysis
20145
19 19904
20 20114

About William Scarth

William Scarth is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Accounting and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 48 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (21 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (16 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (16 papers), Economic theories and models (12 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (8 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers) and Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (192 citations), Economics and Econometrics (233 citations), Finance (75 citations), Accounting (23 citations) and General Energy (1 citation). William Scarth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Marston, William B. P. Robson, Ian King, Roy E. Bailey, Bluford H. Putnam, Jagdeep S. Bhandari, Syed F. Mahmud, A. Leslie Robb, Casper van Ewijk and Gordon M. Myers. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique, Canadian Public Policy, The Economic Journal, Economica and Oxford Economic Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact