Oxford Economic Papers

2.6k papers and 71.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Oxford Economic Papers in the last decades have received a total of 71.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Oxford Economic Papers usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.8k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (846 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (332 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (523 papers), Economic theories and models (432 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (358 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford Economic Papers are Paul Collier, Robert J. Barro, Amartya Sen, Nemat Shafik, W. M. Corden, Scott Barrett, Luiz De Mello, Robert E. Lucas, John Vickers and John Hoddinott.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Oxford Economic Papers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford Economic Papers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford Economic Papers.

Countries where authors publish in Oxford Economic Papers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford Economic Papers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford Economic Papers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford Economic Papers more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025