Canadian Public Policy

3.1k papers and 36.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Canadian Public Policy in the last decades have received a total of 36.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Canadian Public Policy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (860 papers), Political Science and International Relations (744 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (620 papers) specifically the topics of Canadian Policy and Governance (463 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (233 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (232 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Canadian Public Policy are Richard Florida, Ted D. Naylor, Scott Davies, Alasdair Roberts, Paul Sabatier, Hank Jenkins‐Smith, Michael Fullan, Alan M. Rugman, Evelyn L. Forget and Bruce W. Wilkinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Canadian Public Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Canadian Public Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Canadian Public Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Canadian Public Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Canadian Public Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Canadian Public Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Public Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025