Mark Toma

476 citations
29 papers · 234 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Toma

26 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

Mark Toma
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 124
  • Finance 90
  • Economics and Econometrics 174
  • Accounting 38
  • Political Science and International Relations 37
Replace William Scarth with:
William Scarth Canada
Jean-Claude Chouraqui United States
Magdalena Polan Belgium
Carl-Ludwig Holtfrerich Germany
Takero Doi Japan
Basant K. Kapur Singapore
Bernhard Winkler Germany
Ichiro Otani United States
Jean-Claude Trichet Germany
Keith M. Carlson United States
Mark Toma relative to William Scarth Canada William Scarth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
William Scarth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Toma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Toma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Toma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Toma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Toma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Toma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Toma. The network helps show where Mark Toma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mark Toma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Toma Line = papers co-authored together Mark Toma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198255
2 198625
3 199218
4 198015
5 199114
6 199310
7 198610
8 19929
9 19918
10 19807
11 19977
12 19917
13
Competition and Monopoly in the Federal Reserve System, 1914–1951: A Microeconomic Approach to Monetary History
19977
14 19856
15 19895
16 19855
17 19895
18 19994
19 19844
20 19913

About Mark Toma

Mark Toma is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Accounting, having authored 29 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (11 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (11 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (8 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (8 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (6 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (124 citations), Finance (90 citations), Economics and Econometrics (174 citations), Accounting (38 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (37 citations). Mark Toma has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eugenia Froedge Toma, Brian Goff, William K. Hutchinson, Lawrence W. Kenny, A. Steven Holland, George K. Davis and Richard A. Jensen. Their work appears in journals such as Public Choice, Journal of money credit and banking, Journal of Monetary Economics, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Explorations in Economic History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact