William S. Wright

541 citations
23 papers · 334 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William S. Wright

20 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

William S. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Ophthalmology 173
  • Clinical Biochemistry 34
  • Neurology 34
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 64
  • Biochemistry 9
Replace Nagihan Uğurlu with:
Nagihan Uğurlu Türkiye
Maria Tyrberg Sweden
Tanja Endermann Netherlands
Martha Dietzel Germany
Matthew J. Nutaitis United States
Mete Güler Türkiye
Marc H. Levy United States
Hasan Kızıltoprak Türkiye
Lilia Aikawa da Silveira United States
Nis Andersen Denmark
William S. Wright relative to Nagihan Uğurlu Türkiye Nagihan Uğurlu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Nagihan Uğurlu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William S. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Wright. The network helps show where William S. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside William S. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William S. Wright Line = papers co-authored together William S. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201472
2 200839
3 200837
4 200935
5 201231
6 201125
7 197024
8 201815
9 202411
10 20109
11 20185
12 20115
13 20095
14 20194
15 20224
16 20174
17 20203
18 20202
19 19782
20 20232

About William S. Wright

William S. Wright is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Biochemistry, Neurology and Cancer Research, having authored 23 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Neurological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (173 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (34 citations), Neurology (34 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (64 citations) and Biochemistry (9 citations). William S. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Norman R. Harris, Randa S. Eshaq, Walton K.T. Shim, Amit Singh Yadav, Mohammed K. Khalil, Michael W. Wiederman, Songlin Zhang, A. Edward Blackhurst, Thomas A. Blackwell and Tak Yee Aw. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, BMC Medical Education, Inflammation Research, Comprehensive physiology and Current Eye Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact