William S. Wright

519 citations
23 papers · 347 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William S. Wright

21 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

William S. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ophthalmology 207
  • Clinical Biochemistry 50
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 113
  • Neurology 38
  • Nephrology 13
Replace Abraham Kuot with:
Abraham Kuot Australia
Fatma Yülek Türkiye
Samuel Burnim United States
Thomas J. Heesterbeek Netherlands
E. M. Kohner United Kingdom
Nis Andersen Denmark
Bernadett Ujhelyi Hungary
Hui Lou China
Prithvi S. Sankar United States
Lily Agrawal United States
William S. Wright relative to Abraham Kuot Australia Abraham Kuot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Abraham Kuot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William S. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Wright. The network helps show where William S. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside William S. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William S. Wright Line = papers co-authored together William S. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201467
2 200838
3 200936
4 200836
5 201232
6 202030
7 201125
8 197021
9 201814
10 20109
11 20247
12 20096
13 20114
14 20174
15 20184
16 20194
17 20223
18 20202
19 20202
20 19782

About William S. Wright

William S. Wright is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Gender Studies and Molecular Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (3 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (207 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (50 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (113 citations), Neurology (38 citations) and Nephrology (13 citations). William S. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Norman R. Harris, Randa S. Eshaq, Amit Singh Yadav, Walton K.T. Shim, Gaganpreet Kaur, Min‐Sup Lee, Mohammed K. Khalil, Michael W. Wiederman, Songlin Zhang and Thomas H. Blackwell. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, BMC Medical Education, Comprehensive physiology, Inflammation Research and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact