Nis Andersen

621 citations
34 papers · 418 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Nis Andersen

30 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Nis Andersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Ophthalmology 267
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 193
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 43
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 17
  • Nephrology 15
Replace Angie Eaton with:
Angie Eaton United States
Siqi Wu United States
Ildar F. Nuriev Germany
Artur F. Zaynetdinov Germany
Inga I. Arslangareeva Germany
Abraham Kuot Australia
Thomas W. Wilson Canada
Eva‐Maria Paulus Germany
William S. Wright United States
Nis Andersen relative to Angie Eaton United States Angie Eaton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Angie Eaton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nis Andersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nis Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nis Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nis Andersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nis Andersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nis Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nis Andersen. The network helps show where Nis Andersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nis Andersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nis Andersen Line = papers co-authored together Nis Andersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201671
2 201449
3 201847
4 200539
5 199426
6 199425
7 202218
8 200817
9 199616
10 202213
11 202311
12 199110
13 202210
14 20219
15 20238
16 20237
17 20237
18 19956
19 20074
20
Inter grader agreement in the Danish screening program for diabetic retinopathy
20223

About Nis Andersen

Nis Andersen is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (23 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (18 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (9 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (267 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (193 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (43 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (17 citations) and Nephrology (15 citations). Nis Andersen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jakob Grauslund, Toke Bek, Caroline Schmidt Laugesen, J. Andresen, Morten la Cour, Steffen Heegaard, Henrik Horwitz, Jón Trærup Andersen, Espen Jimenez‐Solem and Henrik E. Poulsen. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, Acta Diabetologica, Brain Communications and Diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact