William L. Blake
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
- Hepatology top 10%
- Liver physiology and pathology
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Pancreatic function and diabetes 4
- Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism 2
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 3
- Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors 3
- Co-authors
- Steven D. Clarke (7 shared papers)Stephen D. Phinney (1 shared paper)Carlos A. Agudelo (1 shared paper)Kenneth Dorko (3 shared papers)Roberto Gramignoli (3 shared papers)Marc C. Hansel (3 shared papers)Mark Wilson (1 shared paper)Lisa M. Salati (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (4 papers)Journal of Nutrition (2 papers)Journal of Animal Science (1 paper)The Journal of Immunology (1 paper)Toxicological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenItaly
In The Last Decade
William L. Blake
19 papers receiving 597 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Biochemistry 116
- Hepatology 77
- Nutrition and Dietetics 131
- Clinical Biochemistry 34
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 76
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Blake
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Blake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Blake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Blake. The network helps show where William L. Blake may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William L. Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 113 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 78 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 55 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 48 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 42 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 27 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 1 |
About William L. Blake
William L. Blake is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Biochemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (5 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (3 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (116 citations), Hepatology (77 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (131 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (34 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (76 citations). William L. Blake has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Clarke, Stephen D. Phinney, Carlos A. Agudelo, Kenneth Dorko, Roberto Gramignoli, Marc C. Hansel, Mark Wilson, Lisa M. Salati, Stephen C. Strom and George W. Melchior. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Animal Science, The Journal of Immunology and Toxicological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.