Rose M. Fields

608 citations
16 papers · 545 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Rose M. Fields

15 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

Rose M. Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 192
  • Hepatology 63
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 84
  • Molecular Biology 189
  • Biochemistry 17
Replace Yoichi Inada with:
Yoichi Inada Japan
Rouzbeh Mostaedi United States
James D. Bomboy United States
K. Schwarz Germany
Anneke Jans Netherlands
Tamás Halmos Hungary
C. D. N. Toseland United Kingdom
Sam Switzer United States
Marcus C. Dugas United States
Rocco Gulli United States
Rose M. Fields relative to Yoichi Inada Japan Yoichi Inada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.9×
Yoichi Inada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose M. Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose M. Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose M. Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose M. Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose M. Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose M. Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose M. Fields. The network helps show where Rose M. Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose M. Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose M. Fields Line = papers co-authored together Rose M. Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1986139
2 199199
3 197966
4 198766
5 197650
6 198025
7 197721
8 198019
9 198116
10 198113
11 199211
12 199311
13 19715
14 19812
15 19701
16 19761

About Rose M. Fields

Rose M. Fields is a scholar working on Hepatology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (5 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (4 papers), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (2 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Lipid metabolism and disorders (2 papers) and Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (192 citations), Hepatology (63 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (84 citations), Molecular Biology (189 citations) and Biochemistry (17 citations). Rose M. Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara V. Howard, William F. Beltz, Scott M. Grundy, Marja‐Riitta Taskinen, Peter H. Bennett, David M. Mott, Gustav Schonfeld, I Harper, B. V. Howard and James Sommercorn. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes, Metabolism, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, Infection and Immunity and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact