William Keith

600 citations
41 papers · 405 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William Keith

29 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

William Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Philosophy 174
  • Literature and Literary Theory 147
  • Communication 73
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
  • Language and Linguistics 34
Replace John Poulakos with:
John Poulakos United States
Joshua Gunn United States
Steven Mailloux United States
S. Michael Halloran United States
Bruce E. Gronbeck United States
Wlad Godzich United States
Eugene Garver United States
J. Robert Cox United States
Cara A. Finnegan United States
Menahem Blondheim Israel
William Keith relative to John Poulakos United States John Poulakos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
John Poulakos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Keith. The network helps show where William Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside William Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Keith Line = papers co-authored together William Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Rhetorical Hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science
1997122
2
Democracy as Discussion: Civic Education and the American Forum Movement
200750
3 201442
4 201132
5
The Essential Guide to Rhetoric
200824
6 200817
7 200013
8 201112
9 200812
10 201211
11 20029
12 20087
13 19886
14 20166
15 20115
16 19925
17 20025
18 20144
19 19934
20 19942

About William Keith

William Keith is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (12 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (11 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (3 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (174 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (147 citations), Communication (73 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations) and Language and Linguistics (34 citations). William Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alan G. Gross, David Beard, Sang‐Yeon Kim, S. Scott Graham, Julien Talpin, Kenneth S. Zagacki, Jane Mansbridge, Ann B. Shteir, Steven Shapin and Graham Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Argumentation, Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Social Epistemology, Quarterly Journal of Speech and Rhetoric Society Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact