Rhetoric Society Quarterly

870 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 870 papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly usually cover Philosophy (508 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (266 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (177 papers) specifically the topics of Rhetoric and Communication Studies (442 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (162 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rhetoric Society Quarterly are Martin J. Medhurst, Jenny Edbauer, Ekaterina V. Haskins, Carolyn R. Miller, Gerard A. Hauser, Patricia Bizzell, Arthur E. Walzer, Cheryl Geisler, Jordynn Jack and Greg Dickinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhetoric Society Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025