Countries where authors publish in Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhetoric Society Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly.
About Rhetoric Society Quarterly
The 916 papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Rhetoric Society Quarterly usually cover Philosophy (531 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (280 papers), Communication (112 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (38 papers) and History (67 papers) specifically the topics of Rhetoric and Communication Studies (461 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (166 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (76 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (52 papers), Media Studies and Communication (48 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (47 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (43 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rhetoric Society Quarterly are Jenny Edbauer, Martin J. Medhurst, Ekaterina V. Haskins, Carolyn R. Miller, Gerard A. Hauser, Patricia L. Bizzell, Cheryl Geisler, Arthur E. Walzer, Jordynn Jack and Susan C. Jarratt.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.